Here in the State of Pennsylvania, (probably every state), the Legislators have enacted laws that prohibit the Common Man from being able to record Court Proceedings lest the People perceive how far off from the pursuit of Justice the Courts have veered in their mad rush towards corporate profits. The issues that People are forced to deal with through them, and the police that serve them, is reminiscent of the book and movie entitled “Animal Farm” that portrays by animal characters a nation’s descent into Communist socialism and the evils effected thereby.

I have no respect for the Courts of this Nation, nor their minions, any more than I do the “Corporation” whom they swear their service to when not swearing allegiance to their “worshipful masters” in the local lodges of the demonic. (Literally.)

The Devil’s “sword” in this application is two edged; the State and the Federal Court systems. Though they are “intertwined,” each County in this current endeavor has been supplied with a site whereupon which to enable the People to see and realize what their elected Civil servants have been up to in regard to their Duties. And, also a Way to make them once more accountable to the People whose Constitution they took an Oath to Uphold.

(The filing of appeals is futile when consideration is given to that which an attorney told me, saying,”What good will that do you? They all golf and drink together before going to their lodge; and they are not on your side…”; indeed, it is they working as a team that got you where you are now.)

Verily the only answer to this dilemma is to shine light upon their incorporated activities that prey upon the Citizen rather than Uphold Our Civil Rights as Americans.

The County of Butler seems to be one of the most bedeviled of all counties in Pennsylvania, (from the cops to the magistrates to the judges and even the very commissioners themselves!) and the following cases will open the eyes of many to the Breach of Fiduciary Duty committed as a matter of Pattern and Practice.

Some cases and true stories

Case #1 – Cheyenne L. Goodin V. Butler County Courts

The true story of a courageous young mother’s pursuit to save her 2 years of age son from a man that she believes molested him and called the State Police to escort her and her son away from him.


Cheyenne Louise Goodin PRO SE Case # 2:21-cv-00265

Plaintiff V, Butler, Pa CYS;

Butler, Pa. Domestic Relations;

Butler, Pa. Public Defender’s Office;

Butler, Pa. District Attorney;

County of Butler, Pa.

Solicitor of Butler, Pa.

Attorney Bobette Roper Magnusen

Attorney Amy Burton


Each of the listed defendants are being sued in their individual capacity as well as functioning officers of listed offices of Butler County. However, until subpoenas are submitted thereto to obtain the names and actions according to court documents of those who willfully acted as a coordinated team to turn a blind eye to violations of State Law and Federally protected Constitutional Rights; their listings shall be refrained until the fact finding sought thereby is attained.


Now comes the Pro SE Plaintiff Cheyenne L. Goodin, filing this Amended Complaint with the assistance of Matthew P. Dec who has volunteered his Service for the Public good to act as an assistant Private Attorney General and has permitted me to place my story upon his website “” to show the People of this Nation how defunct and despotic the Butler County court system appears to have become. Although he undoubtedly desires good for the people and is using this circumstance to instill unity and action within every Patriot, as well as Felons and their loved ones he intends to unionize to bring a new Hope. To solidify ardent wantonness for political confrontation within every Constitutionalist across the country (as he has in the past written for several “militia sites” and soon will be again). This thing is getting a bit big for me and all I want is my son removed from that pervert who falsified my son’s Birth Records and committed perjury on every court document claiming that he is the biological father thereby instituting Fraud upon the Court. And, although Mr. Dec esteems you as a fascist traitor fit for Federal Prison and/or political removal as you will see upon his site. I inform this court that this is his agenda – not mine. I am grateful to him for being the only person that would stand with me and help me, and I respect him as he doesn’t hide his disdain for what he believes you are and they are. In fact, the very reason this Preamble was written was that he and I held discourse about this case, them, you, and his site. I do not want to believe that you are nothing but a Masonic traitor whose sole purpose for being appointed to your position by a homosexual from Kenya is to delineate our Civil Rights to bring us under the Corporate Jurisdiction of an increasingly fascist-socialist government; (as he says) that have turned the courts and prisons into a corporation that preys upon We the People but everything Matt has said so far seems true. He said that when Gilbert Smith hired Mike Zunder who is reported to be a “homosexual that left his wife for other men” I may as well forget the Butler County courts as DA Goldinger is also one of his “boyfriends” (who also was by reports was playing “judge Doerr” with a former public defender named Kerry Starr in return for court favors before she fled with her husband to Florida it is believed to try to save her marriage 😉 and that my son would be where he is with a man who is not his father showering with him. I didn’t believe it. He was right it would seem. He said that neither the police who serve as “capos” (or, Jews that betrayed, beat, and murdered their own for the Nazis) for their “worshipful masters,” nor even sheriff Slupe (who is the Constitutional Executive Officer and is doing as much now as he did then when judge Doerr “concubined” the wives of the probation department for job promotions) would help any more than the probation officers would do anything though such corruption was committed before their eyes. (and yet expect Us to respect them.) He was right it would seem. I guess I can only hope and pray that he is wrong about you and the judges of the federal courts he says are, “corrupt trees that need ‘ripped up from the roots” to set an example. Respectfully… Cheyenne L. Goodin 400 Virginia Av. Apt. 2 Butler, Pa. 16001 724-996-1419




124 West Diamond St. 1-26-202

PO Box 1208

Butler, PA.16001

I, Cheyenne L. Goodin, do hereby appeal the decision reached by your department to close my case. You do not have the power to give my son to a man that I rented off because he falsified his name on my son’s Birth Certificate.

He is not the biological father as your agency insists upon falsifying within Public Records; by doing this YOU ARE CONSPIRATORS TO CRIMINAL ACTIONS!

He is not the father of my son In Loco Parentis; he is nothing more than a man that used and abused me after the father of my son abandoned me there with nowhere to go.

I respectfully request an expedited appeal process to remove my son from that alcoholic intravenous drug using porn addict.

EXAMPLE #1: Because a slum lord has 48 dope whores who are too doped up to realize the consequences of him falsifying Birth Certificates of all 48 children born to the whores so he can collect $144,000 a year in tax credits; when they get off the dope and realize what was done to them you are supposed to help THEM not HIM!

EXAMPLE #2: If an individual after watching your handling of this case decided to go to Mexico and enter the maternity wards to give 100 poverty stricken mothers $100 to have him sign his name on the Birth Certificate to give the child Citizenship and to collect $3000 a year equaling $3,000,000.00 in tax returns; would you consent and say, “That’s not only lawful; but one HELL OF AN IDEA!!!”

With that I close my Appeal, and also my position thereon.


Cheyenne L. Goodin

400 Virginia Av. Apt. 2

Butler, Pa. 16001



Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.”

Contained within this code is found the statement of : “…the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law…”

As pertaining unto the “LAWS ” – Off hand there are three LAWS that scream in this court’s face;

1- 42 Pa Code § 4911. Tampering with public records or information.

(a) Offense defined.–A person commits an offense if he:

(1) knowingly makes a false entry in, or false alteration of, any record,

document or thing belonging to, or received or kept by, the government for

information or record, or required by law to be kept by others for

information of the government;

(2) makes, presents or uses any record, document or thing knowing it to be false,

and with intent that it be taken as a genuine part of information or records

referred to in paragraph (1) of this subsection…

This statute was violated with the knowledge and approval of each and every

listed actor within this complaint. Plaintiff has besought every listed actor to

address these criminal actions, and has met with deliberate resistance from each

as a combined form of conspiracy to not only deliver her 2 year old son to the

man that performed the acts; but also, acting as an organized syndicate, has

ensured that his actions were “brushed under the rug.”

B- Perjury


4902.  Perjury.

  1. Offense defined.–A person is guilty of perjury, a felony of the third

degree, if in any official proceeding he makes a false statement under oath

or equivalent affirmation, or swears or affirms the truth of a statement

previously made, when the statement is material and he does not believe

it to be true.

  1. Materiality.–Falsification is material, regardless of the admissibility of the

statement under rules of evidence, if it could have affected the course or

outcome of the proceeding. It is no defense that the declarant mistakenly

believed the falsification to be immaterial. Whether a falsification is material in a

given factual situation is a question of law.

  1. Irregularities no defense.–It is not a defense to prosecution under this

section that the oath or affirmation was administered or taken in an

irregular manner or that the declarant was not competent to make the

statement. A document purporting to be made upon oath or affirmation at

any time when the actor presents it as being so verified shall be deemed to

have been duly sworn or affirmed…”

Each and every Defendant listed in this case has conspired thereto and

acted in commitment thereof.


§ 4101. Forgery.

  1. Offense defined.–A person is guilty of forgery if, with intent to

defraud or injure anyone, or with knowledge that he is facilitating a fraud or

injury to be perpetrated by anyone, the actor:

(1) alters any writing of another without his authority;


(2)makes, completes, executes, authenticates, issues or transfers any

writing so that it purports to be the act another who did not authorize that

act, or to have been executed at a time or place or in a numbered

sequence other than was in fact the case, or to be a copy of an original


when no such original existed; or


(3) utters any writing which he knows to be forged in a manner specified in

paragraphs (1) or (2) of this subsection.


Each and every defendant listed was informed what this man had done and

concurred with the preceeding criminal acts committed. In fact, two of the listed

defendants (Magnusan and Burton) went so far to as to have a judge declare Ms.

Goodin “mentally incompetent” and forbidden to speak to the court lest the facts

that this case being one big Fraud upon the Court be written in court record!

Now, the questions before this Court are;

  1. Did the listed defendants violate their Oath to Uphold the Constitution

and the Laws of the Land when they were presented with the knowledge that

that man falsified Birth Records and Court Documents to steal her son; and said

That’s the way we do things around here…?”

Of course they did.

  1. Did the listed defendants err when they denied Plaintiff Equal Protection

(Fifth Amendment) to ensure accuracy of records under the Law?

Of course they did.

  1. Did the listed defendants err when they denied Plaintiff proper Procedural

Due Process (Fourteenth Amendment) by pushing to close the case when

they KNEW every Court Record was false?

Of course they did.

  1. Did the listed defendants manifest a policy of trampling Rights upon

receiving an opportunity to correct this issue when first sued, and yet refusing to

correct the Constitutional errors and even criminal acts as one cohesive unit?

Of course they did.

  1. Did the defendants violate the First Amendment Right to Familial

Association and even greater Intimate Association? (When dealing with “Intimate

Association” issues the courts by order of the Supreme Court must utilize “strict


Therefore, the question to be answered is… Did the officers of the court apply

strict scrutiny” by giving Plaintiff’s son to a criminal and a perjurer and denying

her the Right to even visit him via court actions based upon Fraud?

A Jury won’t believe so.

Indeed, this USC 1983 possesses elements enabling it to overcome qualified

immunity in accordance unto the Monell Doctrine.

USC 1985 Conspiracy Against Civil Rights

A Jury would be hard pressed not to see a Conspiracy amongst

each of these defendants in Light of the Facts of this case.

  1. As for the RICO ACT, even as police can be charged therewith as was the

judges in the “Kids for Cash” escapade initiated here in PA., Plaintiff believes that

she can show an organized corruption of violation of state and federal laws

committed by the defendants in respect to having a Court of

Justice mutated into a controlled corporation that tramples Rights and winks at

crime as part of its process of “Constituents for Cash.”

As for “Constituents for Cash” at the expense of violation of their Oaths of

Office, Plaintiff can provide to a Jury other instances of persons held in prison

until they plead to crimes which by the elements required they are innocent

of; as well as sentencing persons without even an attorney in violation of the

Sixth Amendment and the Fourteenth; as well as separating charges from a single

incident in violation of the Fifth Amendment; making them the most heinous of

RICO perpetrators.

Scroll to Top